Introduction
Ageing water infrastructure is a pressing issue for municipalities across the globe. As water, wastewater, and sewer lines are designed to last for decades, it is not uncommon for them to remain in service well beyond their expected lifespan. This situation becomes increasingly problematic as structural issues are often not addressed in a timely manner. Decades-old pumps and pipes struggle to meet modern demands, leading to significant challenges in maintaining efficient water systems.
Condition of Pipes
Repair vs. Replace
When faced with ageing water infrastructure, municipalities must decide whether to repair or replace the existing systems. The condition of the pipes plays a crucial role in this decision-making process:
Repair: If the damage is minor, such as small cracks or leaks, repairing the pipes can restore functionality without extensive work. This approach is often less disruptive and more cost-effective in the short term.
Replace: For severely corroded or structurally compromised pipes, replacement is often necessary to avoid ongoing issues. This option, while more expensive upfront, ensures long-term reliability and compliance with current standards.
Age of the System
The age of the system is another critical factor:
Repair: Relatively newer systems (under 30 years old) may only require minor repairs to continue functioning effectively.
Replace: Older systems (50-plus years) are often prone to frequent failures and may no longer meet modern standards, making full replacement the more prudent choice.
Cost Considerations
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Investment
The financial implications of repairing versus replacing ageing water infrastructure cannot be overlooked:
Repair: Repairs generally cost less upfront but may not address underlying issues, leading to higher maintenance costs over time. This can create a cycle of repeated repairs that ultimately proves more costly.
Replace: While replacements involve a higher initial investment, they provide long-term reliability and reduced maintenance costs. This makes them a more sustainable choice in the long run.
Environmental Impact of Ageing Infrastructure
Repairing vs. Replacing
The environmental impact of these decisions also warrants consideration:
Repair: Typically, repairing pipes causes less disruption to the surrounding area, making it a more environmentally friendly choice for minor issues.
Replace: Although replacement can be more disruptive, it may be necessary to ensure a sustainable and efficient system in the future.
Future Needs and Capacity
Assessing Current and Future Demands
Municipalities must also consider future needs when evaluating ageing water infrastructure:
Repair: If the existing system meets current demands, repairs can extend its lifespan without major changes.
Replace: For systems that require increased capacity or improved performance due to growth or new regulations, replacement is often the best option.
The Urgency of Addressing Ageing Infrastructure
The urgency of addressing ageing water infrastructure cannot be overstated. An analysis conducted by the Utah Water Research Laboratory in 2023 surveyed around 400,000 miles of water mains across the United States and Canada. The findings revealed that approximately 20% of pipes are beyond their useful life and need replacement, amounting to an estimated $452 billion in repairs—a 25% increase from 2018. Furthermore, there are roughly 260,000 structural failures annually, averaging 11.1 breaks per 100 miles.
Maintenance Challenges
Urgent maintenance is necessary, but the costs of fixing these 260,000 pipe failures exceed tens of billions of dollars. The varying condition of infrastructure—depending on installation year, flow rate, and location—complicates the establishment of a comprehensive sewer rehabilitation schedule within budgetary constraints.
Local governments and utility providers cannot afford to delay action. For instance, a single valve that drips once per second leaks approximately 0.25 milliliters with each drop, equating to roughly 2,028 gallons per year. Multiplying this figure by every leak results in staggering losses.
Age-Related Degradation: The Most Pressing Issue
Age-related degradation is the most significant contributor to the decline of wastewater infrastructure. Factors such as hydrogen sulfide gas and general wear-and-tear can deteriorate systems, but age is often deprioritized due to its lack of immediate threat. Consequently, pipes are often left without maintenance for decades longer than intended.
Funding Challenges for Infrastructure Repairs
In the U.S., the urban population increased by 6.4% from 2010 to 2020, now accounting for approximately 80% of the total population. This growth places additional strain on already compromised pipes and complicates the approval process for necessary work. Furthermore, funding remains a significant barrier. Although states have collectively spent approximately $20 billion on water infrastructure through the American Rescue Plan Act, experts estimate that necessary repairs will require $1 trillion in spending over the next two decades.
Choosing the Best Sewer Rehabilitation Method
With the challenges of replacing compromised segments being both time-consuming and costly, sewer rehabilitation has emerged as a less disruptive alternative. However, selecting the best method is crucial for maximizing benefits. Factors such as pipe characteristics—age, diameter, slope, and depth—play significant roles in determining the appropriate rehabilitation approach.
Nonstructural vs. Structural Methods
Decision-makers generally have two options for rehabilitation: nonstructural or structural methods. Nonstructural methods are ideal for proactive repairs to extend the lifespan of semi-degraded pipelines, while structural methods are necessary for infrastructure that is compromised to any extent. Both approaches can restore the sewer line’s useful life and counteract the effects of ageing.
Effective Sewer Rehabilitation Techniques
Several nonstructural and structural sewer rehabilitation methods have proven effective:
Corrosion-Resistant Coatings
This nonstructural method employs a protective corrosion-resistant coating to limit damage to pipe walls. It should be applied before structural damage occurs. Proper cleaning and drying of the compromised segment are essential for effective bonding.
Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP)
Cured-in-place pipe technology has gained popularity for its trenchless application. Metro Water Recovery, the largest wastewater treatment provider in the Rocky Mountain West, rehabilitates up to 20,000 linear feet annually using this method. CIPP minimizes public impact and enhances efficiency.
Reinforced Polymer Lining
Reinforcing compromised pipes with a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer lining is a timely and cost-efficient method. The Houston Public Works’ North 60 Line serves as a successful example, undergoing strategic repairs under the Transmission Line Condition Assessment and Rehabilitation Program (TLCARP). This method utilizes advanced testing to identify damage and applies repairs in a controlled environment.
Conclusion
The challenge of ageing water infrastructure is a critical issue that municipalities must address to ensure the sustainability and efficiency of their water systems. With the increasing demand for reliable water services, decision-makers must carefully weigh the options of repair versus replacement.
By employing effective rehabilitation methods and acknowledging the urgency of the situation, local governments can make informed choices that balance short-term savings with long-term reliability. Ultimately, addressing ageing water infrastructure will be essential in meeting the needs of growing populations and maintaining public health and safety
To explore the latest innovations in water and energy technologies, and discover a wide range of products and solutions from around the world, you can visit the virtual exhibition AQUA ENERGY EXPO which featuring leading companies in water treatment, desalination, and sustainable energy through the following link:
References
Sewer System Rehabilitation: When to Repair vs. When to Replace
https://www.mswmag.com/bytes/2024/12/sewer-system-rehabilitation-when-to-repair-vs-when-to-replace
320 MGD BY 2024
https://www.newppexpansion.com/
The challenge of Aging infrastructure how to choose the best sewer Rehabilitation method
https://utilitycontractormagazine.com/aging-infrastructure/
